THOMAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Wong SUN v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (U.S. 1963)
  …to a narcotics sale in which he was the buyer, the officers had good reason to rely on Horn Way’s knowledge. See Rodgers v. United States, 267 F. 2d 79 (C. A. 9th Cir. 1959), and Thomas v. United States, 281 F. 2d 132 (C. A. 8th Cir.), cert, denied, 364 U. S. 904 (1960). As to his credibility, he was confronted with prosecution for possession of narcotics and well knew that any discrepancies in his story might go hard with him. Furthermore, the statement was a declaration against interest which stripped Horn…
• Whiting v. United States, 321 F.2d 72 (1st Cir. 1963)
  …97; Draper v. United States, 1959, 358 U.S. 307, 79 S.Ct. 329, 3 L.Ed.2d 327; United States v. Eisner, 6 Cir., 1962, 297 F. 2d 595, cert. den. 369 U.S. 859, 82 S.Ct. 947, 8 L.Ed.2d 17. Thomas v. United States, 8 Cir., 1960, 281 F. 2d 132, cert. den. 364 U.S. 904, 81 S.Ct. 239, 5 [*77] L.Ed.2d 196. But cf. Wong Sun v. United States, 1963, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441. . See fn. 10, supra. All that we decided on the prior appeal, 296 F. 2d 512, was that distant hearsay was inadmissible on the su…
• Junius S. Washington v. United States, 401 F.2d 915 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …d sufficiently complete to enable an informed determination as to whether assigned error was actually committed. See In re Chapman Coal Co., 196 F. 2d 779, 785 (7th Cir. 1952); Thomas v. United States, 281 F. 2d 132, 136-137 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 364 U.S. 904, 81 S.Ct. 239, 5 L.Ed.2d 196 (1960); United States v. Vanegas, 216 F. 2d 657, 658 (9th Cir. 1954). Transcripts of the evidence given at pretrial hearings on motions to suppress do not constitute exceptions to this requirement. [*920] United States v…