SANTOS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. EL Paso Natural GAS Co., 386 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1967)
  …U. S. C. App. Rule 24 (1964 ed., Supp. II). The I PC will protect Cascade’s existing supply of gas when New Company applies for certification. See, e. g., Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 108 U. S. App. D. C. 409, 283 F. 2d 204, cert. denied, 364 U. S. 913, Pyle-National Co. v. Amos, 172 F. 2d 425 (C. A. 7th Cir.); Mack v. Passaic Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 150 F. 2d 474, 154 F. 2d 907 (C. A. 3d Cir.); In re Standard Power & Light Corp., 48 F. Supp. 716 (D. C. Del.). Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F. 2d 463…
• Braniff Airways v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 379 F.2d 453 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …pports the findings upon which the agency has predicated its conclusions. See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409, 423 n. 41, 283 F. 2d 204, 218 n. 41, cert. denied, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Consol. Gas Co., 364 U.S. 913, 81 S.Ct. 276, 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960); Capital Transit Co. v. Public Util. Comm., 93 U.S.App.D.C. 194, 205, 213 F. 2d 176, 187 (1953), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 816, 75 S.Ct. 25, 99 L.Ed. 643 (1954); 2 Davis, Administrative Law § 16.06 (1958). The “poss…
• Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …receive that careful consideration which the statute contemplates. See Michigan Consolidated Gas [*613] Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 108 U.S. App.D.C. 409, 283 F. 2d 204, 226, cert. denied, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Consol. Gas Co., 364 U.S. 913, 81 S.Ct. 276, 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960) Petitioners’ application, pursuant to § 313 (b), 16 U.S.C. § 8251(b), to adduce additional evidence is granted.8 We set aside the three orders of the Commission to which the petition is addressed and remand the ca…

  ← 1 / 4 →