HEEBNER ET UX.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & its subsidiary v. Schlesinger, 542 F.2d 1190 (4th Cir. 1976)
  …gency regulation”); Elmo Division of Drive-X Company v. Dixon (1965), 121 U.S.App.D.C. 113, 348 F. 2d 342, 344-6. See, also, McQueary v. Laird (10th Cir. 1971), 449 F. 2d 608, 611, Zirin v. McGinnes (3d Cir. 1960), 282 F. 2d 113, 115, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 921, 81 S.Ct. 286, 5 L.Ed.2d 260 (1960), and Green v. Connally (D.C. three-judge ct. 1971), 330 F.Supp. 1150, 1172, aff’d. sub nom., Coit v. Green, 404 U.S. 997, 92 S.Ct. 564, 30 L.Ed.2d 350 (1971). In McQueary, the Court said: “If a federal officer d…
• Milgo Elec. Corp. v. United Bus. Commc'ns, Inc., 623 F.2d 645 (10th Cir. 1980)
  …708]; Blish, Mize and Silliman Hdwe. Co. v. Time Saver Tools, supra, [10 Cir., 236 F. 2d 913]; Neff Instrument Corporation v. Cohu Electronics, Inc., 9 Cir., 298 F. 2d 82; Amp. Incorporated v. Vaco Products Co., 7 Cir., 280 F. 2d 518, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 921, 81 S.Ct. 286, 5 L.Ed.2d 260. 314 F. 2d at p. 880. [Emphasis supplied]. 3. UBC contends it did not infringe on any of the Milgo patents. UBC argues that the Court improperly determined that its DS-4800 modem infringed upon the Whang ’023, the Payn…
• Mott Corp. & C. W. Mott Research Eng'rs v. Sunflower Indus., Inc., 314 F.2d 872 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …Zenith Radio Corporation, supra; Blish, Mize and Silliman Hdwe. Co. v. Time Saver Tools, supra; Neff Instrument Corporation v. Cohu Electronics, Inc., 9 Cir., 298 F. 2d 82; Amp Incorporated v. Vaco Products Co., 7 Cir., 280 F. 2d 518, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 921, 81 S.Ct. 286, 5 L.Ed.2d 260. Moreover, the fact that the Mott mower, including the diverging blade tips at an angle in the nature of 65 degrees, has been a commercial success and is capable of more effective performance than any previously devised…