DICKSON, WARDEN,

v.

CHAVEZ ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States ex rel. John McGRATH v. LaVALLEE, 319 F.2d 308 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …74 (9th Cir., 1952); cf. Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. at 494-495, 82 S.Ct. at 513-514, 7 L.Ed.2d 473; Chessman v. Teets, 350 U.S. 3, 76 S.Ct. 34, 100 L.Ed. 4 (1955); Chavez v. Dickson, 280 F. 2d 727, 737— 738 (9th Cir., 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 934, 81 S.Ct. 379, 5 L.Ed.2d 366 (1961). Petitioner has done more than, merely set forth a version of the facts, contradictory to that offered by the State; he alleges with specificity, as noted above, certain conditions which, call into question the…
• Bell v. ARN, 536 F.2d 123 (6th Cir. 1976)
  …are of the rule that State Court rulings on the admissibility of evidence may not be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding unless it raises a federal constitutional question. Chavez v. Dickson, 280 F. 2d 727, 736 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 934, 81 S.Ct. 379, 5 L.Ed.2d 366, rehearing denied, 366 U.S. 922, 81 S.Ct. 1092, 6 L.Ed.2d 244; [*126] Reese v. Cardwell, 410 F. 2d 1125 (6th Cir.). Kinser v. Cooper, 413 F. 2d 730 (6th Cir.). Schleicher v. Wyrick, 529 F. 2d 906, 911 (8th Cir.). We find…
• Martis C. Scalf v. Bennett, 408 F.2d 325 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …rejudicial argument. Although allegedly prejudicial remarks are generally not reviewable in a habeas proceeding, see Jackson v. California, 336 F. 2d 521, 524-525 (9th Cir. 1964) ; Chavez v. Dickson, 280 F. 2d 727, 735 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 934, 81 S.Ct. 379, 5 L.Ed.2d 366 (1961) ; cf. Miller v. Oberhauser, supra, 293 F. 2d at 31, the district court nevertheless considered this contention and resolved it against appellant. Our review of the evidence convinces us that the district court was…