SOLOMON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES; BORROW V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; BACA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; EVANS ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA; UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. V. HANOVER SHOE, INC.; KIRSCHKE ET AL. V. CITY OF HOUSTON; FORD MOTOR CO. V. PACE ET AL.; CARRILLO V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Meredith v. Fair, 306 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …S.Ct. 1397, 3 L.Ed.2d 1. The Supreme Court also refused to reverse the action of Chief Judge Tuttle of the Fifth Circuit when he vacated a stay granted by the District Court, pending appeal, in the University of Georgia case. Danner v. Holmes, 1961, 364 U.S. 939, 81 S.Ct. 686. In this case Judge Tuttle’s order stressed the fact that it was unlikely that this Court would reverse the District Court’s decision in a case in which there had been a trial on a motion for preliminary injunction and a final hearing…
• United States v. Miriani, 422 F.2d 150 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …h Cir.1968); United States v. Dorsey, 290 F. 2d 893 (6th Cir.1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 825, 82 S.Ct. 44, 7 L.Ed.2d 29; Solomon v. United States, 276 F. 2d 669 (6th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 890, 81 S.Ct. 219, 5 L.Ed. 2d 186, reh. denied, 364 U.S. 939, 81 S. Ct. 376, 5 L.Ed.2d 371. The third objection of the defendant is to that portion of the government’s closing argument which suggests that the defendant was a recipient of bribes. Again, no objection was made by the defense and this issue shou…
• Schein v. Chasen, 478 F.2d 817 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …rofits of the other participants. Marcus v. Otis, 168 F. 2d 649 (2 Cir. 1948), modified, 169 F. 2d 148 (2 Cir. 1948); Solomon v. United States, 276 F. 2d 669 (6 Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 890, 81 S.Ct. 219, 5 L.Ed.2d 186 (1960), reh. denied, 364 U.S. 939, 81 S.Ct. 376, 5 L.Ed.2d 371 (1961). Accordingly, we hold that it would be proper to hold Lehman Brothers and Simon just as accountable for the profits made by their tippees Diversified and Investors as the tippees themselves.8 Defendants also cont…