RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT,

v.

GRIFFITH

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Kirk v. State, 227 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
  …y or pecuniary advantage from the said Donald L. Richard, and with intent to compel the said Donald L. Richard to do act or refrain from doing an act against his will * * . United States v. Kravitz, 3 Cir. 1960, 281 F. 2d 581, 587, cert. den. 1961, 364 U.S. 941, 81 S.Ct. 459, 5 L.Ed.2d 372; United States v. Sober, 3 Cir. 1960, 281 F. 2d 244, cert. den. 364 U.S. 879, 81 S.Ct. 167, 5 L.Ed.2d 101; United States v. Tucker, 3 Cir. 1959, 267 F. 2d 212.…
• Isaacs v. United States, 301 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …days. It was a bitterly fought contest with no quarter being asked and none being given by either side. “ * * (S)ome latitude must be given to lawyers’ language in a hard fought case.” United States v. Kravitz, 3 Cir., 281 F. 2d 581, 586, cert. den. 364 U.S. 941, 81 S.Ct. 459, 5 L.Ed.2d 372. “In the heat of oral arguments and summations counsel sometimes use language they would not have used under less trying circumstances, and in order for such comment to constitute reversible error the language used must…
• United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …he individual case he represents the great authority of the United States and he must exercise that responsibility with the circumspection and dignity the occasion calls for. United States v. Kravitz, 281 F. 2d 581, 587 (3d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U. S. 941, 81 S.Ct. 459, 5 L.Ed.2d 372 (1961). Were we sitting as purely a disciplinary body, we might well consider reversing any conviction in which prosecutorial misconduct was evident. [*737] Considerations of judicial administration, however, preclude us…

  ← 1 / 2 →