LOUISIANA EX REL. ALLEN

v.

WALKER, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Cont'l T. V., Inc. v. Gte Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1977)
  …he tied product ...” 356 U. S., at 6. And the Court subsequently approved an exception to this per se rule for “infant industries” marketing a new product. United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F. Supp. 545 (ED Pa. 1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U. S. 567 (1961). See also United States v. Philadelphia Nat. Bank, 374 U. S. 321, 363 (1963), where the Court held presumptively illegal a merger “which produces a firm controlling an undue percentage share of the relevant market I see no doctrinal obstacl…
• United States v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 422 U.S. 86 (U.S. 1975)
  …es at their inception, even if assumed, could not be controlling, for changes in market conditions can deprive once-reasonable arrangements of their justification. United States v. Jerrold Electronics, 187 F. Supp. 545, 560-561 (ED Pa. 1960), aff'd, 365 U. S. 567 (1961). See also United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 353 U. S. 586, 596-598 (1957). The claimed desirability of the challenged arrangements as a response to now-repealed restrictions of Georgia law is therefore relevant only insofar…
• Pitchford v. Pepi, Inc., 531 F.2d 92 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …Motor Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 521 F. 2d 1230 (3d Cir. 1975). See also Anderson v. American Automotive Assoc., 454 F. 2d 1240, 1244, 1246 (9th Cir. 1972). . 425 F. 2d 932 (3d Cir. 1970). . 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), att’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567, 81 S.Ct. 755, 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961). . See Copper Liquor, Inc. v. Adolph Coors, 506 F. 2d 934, 944 (1975) (quality control rationale for imposing vertical territorial restraints insufficient to allow exception to per se rule). . Rea v. Ford Motor…