CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bova v. State, 392 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …ng the invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege, it is generally agreed that the court possesses broad discretion to deny a request for a mid-interrogation consultation, People v. Miller, 185 Cal.App.2d 59, 8 Cal.Rptr. 91 (1960), appeal dismissed 365 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 755, 5 L.Ed.2d 807 (1961), or a mid-cross-examination recess. People v. Lewis, supra. However, curtailment of communication during cross-examination does not mean that a defendant is without assistance of counsel while on the witness stan…
• Marvin Miller aka Marvin James Miller v. E. J. Oberhauser and/or R. W. Wood, 293 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1961)
  …denied on November 23, 1960. An appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed; and “treating the papers whereon the appeal * * * as a petition for [a] writ of certiorari, certiorari [was] denied” on March 20, 1961. Miller v. State, 365 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 755, 5 L.Ed.2d 807. Petitioner petitioned the Supreme Court of California for a writ of habeas corpus on April 10, 1961. This was denied without opinion on April 26, 1961. Although presented to each of seven judges, a panel of this court…