VAN HOOK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424 (U.S. 1962)
  …tates, 275 F. 2d 673 (C. A. 5th Cir.); Black v. United States, 269 F. 2d 38 (C. A. 9th Cir.); Taylor v. United States, 229 F. 2d 826, 832 (C. A. 8th Cir.); Kreuter v. United States, 201 F. 2d 33, 35 (C. A. 10th Cir.). See Van Hook v. United States, 365 U. S. 609, for the relief afforded on direct appeal in a case where the sentencing judge disregarded the mandate of Rule 32 (a). Rule 35 provides in pertinent part: “The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.” As has been pointed out, Rule 35 “w…
• Thompson v. United States, 495 F.2d 1304 (1st Cir. 1974)
  …efore, on the authority of Behrens and Caille, we must vacate the second sentence and remand the case for a third sentencing before the original judge at which petitioner, and his counsel if he so desires, are present. See Van Hook v. United States, 365 U.S. 609, 81 S.Ct. 823, 5 L.Ed.2d 821 (1961) (per curiam); United States v. Leavitt, supra at 1103. The sentence appealed from is hereby vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. . Rule 35 provides in part…
• United States v. Atherton, 430 F.2d 741 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …tes, 319 U.S. 33, 63 S.Ct. 912, 87 L.Ed. 1194 (1943): United States v. Morico, 415 F. 2d 138 (2d Cir. 1969) ; De Remer v. United States, 340 F. 2d 712 (8th Cir. 1965) ; United States v. Van Hook, 284 F. 2d 489 (7th Cir. 1960), rev’d on other grounds 365 U.S. 609, 81 S.Ct. 823, 5 L.Ed.2d 821 (1961) ; United States v. Chodorski, 240 F. 2d 590 (7th Cir. 1956); Tomlinson v. United States, 216 F. 2d 12, 16 (9th Cir. 1954). In Bowles the ground upon which the registrant’s appeal to the President was decided was…

Authorities Cited

• Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301 (U.S. 1961)