VERRET ET AL.
v.
OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., ET AL.
VERRET ET AL.
OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., ET AL.
365 U.S. 768
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 81 S. Ct. 911 · 6 L. Ed. 2d 83 · SCDB 1960-077 · 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1302
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the District Court and the filing and granting of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment was entered by the District Court and that said judgment has been satisfied, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ST. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. R.R. Yardmasters of Am., Afl-Cio, 347 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1965)…ownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216, 43 S.Ct. 263, 67 L.Ed. 620; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13, 42 S.Ct. 422, 66 L.Ed. 814; United States v. Hamburg-American Line, 239 U.S. 466, 36 S.Ct. 212, 60 L.Ed. 387. But see Verret v. Oil Transport Co., 365 U.S. 768, 81 S.Ct. 911, 6 L.Ed.2d 83. Our reversal of the district court’s injunctive order is not to be regarded as a determination of the propriety of the issuance of the order. The sole ground of our reversal is that the cause has become moot. The jud…