MACK

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Am. CAN Co. v. Citrus Feed Co., 436 F.2d 1125 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …ause of action in which the attorney previously represented him, the former client. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., supra 113 F.Supp. at 268-269; accord, Shelley v. The Maccabees, E.D.N.Y.1960, 184 F.Supp. 797, 800, cert. denied, 365 U.S. 818, 81 S.Ct. 699, 5 L.Ed.2d 696; see E. F. Hutton & Co., Inc. v. Brown, supra 305 F.Supp. at 395. As the Canons stipulate, this liability to disqualification extends also to employees, and former employees, of the attorney who has been privy to a clien…
• K-Mart Corp. v. Oriental Plaza, Inc., 875 F.2d 907 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …Bagdad Copper Corp., 284 F. 2d 147, 149 (9th Cir.1960) (any error in dismissing individual plaintiffs from case was harmless since their only interest was in damages and the decision was confined to consideration of injunctive relief), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 818, 81 S.Ct. 700, 5 L.Ed.2d 696 (1961). 2. Consolidation. We start with the pertinent language from the applicable Civil Rule: Before or after the commencement of the hearing of an application for a preliminary injunction, the court may order the tri…
• Rivera v. M/T Fossarina, 840 F.2d 152 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …the latter, “newly discovered evidence” normally refers to “evidence of facts in existence at the time of trial of which the aggrieved party was excusably ignorant.” Brown v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 282 F. 2d 522, 526-27 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 818, 81 S.Ct. 690, 5 L.Ed.2d 696 (1960); Goland v. CIA, 607 F. 2d 339, 371 n. 12 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927, 100 S.Ct. 1312, 63 L.Ed.2d 759 (1980). See also C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2859. It was open to the…