CALLANAN

v.

UNITED STATES; KIMBROUGH V. UNITED STATES; STONE V. UNITED STATES; MENDE V. UNITED STATES; AHEARN ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; ALLEN V. MICHIGAN; CAMPBELL V. TEXAS; CUMMINS V. STROUL, DOING BUSINESS AS STROUL NEWS AGENCY

Citator

Cited By

• Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1962)
  …rlocutory decree. United States v. California Cooperative Canneries, 279 U. S. 553, 558. After probable jurisdiction had been noted, a joint motion of the parties to postpone oral argument on the appeal to the present Term of the Court was granted. 365 U. S. 825. Section 22, 1 Stat. 84, in its present form, 28 U. S. C. § 1291. Cf. 28 U. S. C. § 1292; Fed. Rules Civ. Proe., 54 (b); 28 U. S. C. § 1651; Ex parte United States, 226 U. S. 420; United States v. United States District Court, 334 U. S. 258; Beaco…
• United States v. Skillman, 442 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …[5 Cir.] 298 F. 911, 912-913; Banghart v. United States [4 Cir.], 148 F. 2d [*549] 521.” Id. at 643-644, 66 S.Ct. at 1182, (footnotes omitted). See also Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587, 81 S.Ct. 321, 5 L.Ed.2d 312 (1961), rehearing denied, 365 U.S. 825, 81 S.Ct. 687, 5 L.Ed.2d 703 (1961); Williams v. United States, 292 F. 2d 157 (8th Cir. 1961); Garner v. United States, 277 F. 2d 242 (8th Cir. 1960). Defendant asserts that the cases of Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469…
• United States v. Porth, 426 F.2d 519 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …apply and pros ecution is not barred. United States v. Durkee Famous Foods, 306 U.S. 68, 59 S.Ct. 456, 83 L.Ed. 492 (1939); Mende v. United States, 282 F. 2d 881 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 933, 81 S. Ct. 379, 5 L.Ed.2d 365, reh. denied, 365 U.S. 825, 81 S.Ct. 689, 5 L.Ed.2d 704; United States v. Strewl, 99 F. 2d 474 (2d Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 306 U.S. 638, 59 S.Ct. 489, 83 L.Ed. 1039, reh. denied, 306 U.S. 668, 59 S.Ct. 590, 83 L.Ed. 1063; United States v. Bair, 221 F. Supp. 171 (E.D.Wis.196…