D'ARIA ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES; LO PICCOLO V. UNITED STATES; SANTORE V. UNITED STATES; ORLANDO V. UNITED STATES; AND SANTORE V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• State v. Weaver, 442 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …ave been held to be constitutionally permissible. See, e.g., United States v. Davis, 557 F. 2d 1239 (8th Cir.), cert. denied [*382] 434 U.S. 971, 98 S.Ct. 523, 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1977); United States v. Santore, 290 F. 2d 51 (2d Cir.1960), cert. denied 365 U.S. 834, 81 S.Ct. 749, 5 L.Ed.2d 744 (1961); 11 A.L.R.3d 1330, 1344 (1969). In United States v. Santore, the agent or affiant had no knowledge and was not warned that others lived in the apartment until after the officers had entered the apartment and had s…
• United States v. Bermudez, 526 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …nown of that character, then it is possible that the warrant would fall within the exception provided by United States v. Santore, 290 F. 2d 51, 66-67 (2d Cir. 1959), aff'd in parts here relevant, 290 F. 2d 74 (2d Cir. 1960) (en banc), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 834, 81 S.Ct. 745, 5 L.Ed.2d 743 (1961), to the multi-unit specificity requirement. But in light of our determination that the evidence was properly used as impeachment of Diaz-Martinez at trial, we need not reach this rather troublesome issue. . There…
• Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …side of the structure, the search warrant correctly described the dwelling as housing two separate apartments, both of which the search warrant was clearly designed to cover. In United States v. Santore, 290 F. 2d 51, 66-67 (2 Cir.1960) cert. denied 365 U.S. 834, 81 S.Ct. 749, 5 L.Ed.2d 744, the Court sustained a warrant which directed the search of a one-family house identified by street and number, even though officers upon presentation of the warrant learned that the defendant occupied the basement and s…