GINSBURG

v.

GINSBURG ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …sk that his prior answers may be construed as a waiver of his First and Fifth Amendment rights. (See Presser v. United States (1960) 109 U.S.App.D.C. 99, 284 F. 2d 233, cert. denied (1961) 365 U.S. 816, 81 S.Ct. 694, 5 L.Ed.2d 696, rehearing denied, 365 U.S. 855, 81 S.Ct. 800, 5 L.Ed.2d 820; In re George F. Nord Bldg. Corp. (7th Cir. 1942) 129 F. 2d 173, cert. denied sub nom. Kausal [*1080] v. 79th & Escanaba Corp., 317 U.S. 670, 63 S.Ct. 75, 87 L.Ed. 538.) 10 The potential for abuse is considerably enhanc…
• Davis v. State OF N.C., 339 F.2d 770 (4th Cir. 1964)
  …executive clemency, and the courts are powerless to prescribe the answer. The possibility of any such relief can be explored only with North Carolina’s Governor. Affirmed. . State v. Davis, 253 N.C. 86, 116 S.E. 2d 365. . Davis v. North Carolina, 365 U.S. 855, 81 S.Ct. 816, 5 L.Ed.2d 819. . Davis v. North Carolina, E.D.N.C., 196 F.Supp. 488. . Davis v. State of North Carolina, 4 Cir., 310 F. 2d 904. . Davis v. North Carolina, E.D.N.C., 221 F.Supp. 494. . The District Court found that the request of p…