BEAMAN

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• ST. Regis Paper Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 208 (U.S. 1961)
  …onflict in the circuits on the question of compulsory production of the copies of census reports and the general importance of certain other questions in the administration of the investigatory pro [*213] visions of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 365 U. S. 857. On motion of petitioner, we also granted a stay tolling the further running and accumulation of forfeitures awaiting our decision. We now affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Petitioner contends that it cannot lawfully be required to prod…
• Application of Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman, 291 F.2d 487 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …632, 654, 70 S.Ct. 357, 370, 94 L.Ed. 401, although no method for such examination save a suit against government officers would seem available. See United States v. St. Regis Paper Co., 2 Cir., 1960, 285 F. 2d 607, 615-616, certiorari granted 1961, 365 U.S. 857, 81 S.Ct. 825, 5 L.Ed.2d 822. We are not unmindful of the potentialities of delay inherent in such an extra round — potentialities sufficiently serious without one, as illustrated, for example, by Penfield Co. of Cal. v. S. E. C., 1947, 330 U.S. 58…
• McCURRY v. Allen, 688 F.2d 581 (8th Cir. 1982)
  …ent as to what effect a grant of certiorari would have had was mere dictum, based on United States v. Eisner, 323 F. 2d 38,42 (6th Cir. 1963).4 The correct view is illustrated by the order granting certiorari in St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States, 365 U.S. 857, 858, 81 S.Ct. 825, 5 L.Ed.2d 822 (1961), where the Court specifically tolled the further running and accumulation of forfeitures under a statute applied by the court below. In this case the plaintiff had been put on notice to amend his complaint b…