SILAS L. KELLY, APPELLANT,
v.
EARNICE KELLY, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1966-05-11
No. 5777
ALLEN, C. J., PIERCE, J., and LOVE, WILLIAM K., Associate Judge, concur.
186 So. 2d 89 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower Court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Huwer v. Huwer, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 242.

ALLEN, C. J., PIERCE, J., and LOVE, WILLIAM K., Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Feather v. In re Est. of Harry D. Sanko, 390 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
    …040 requires inclusion in the notice of the consequences of failure to timely file defenses thereto. . Stanley v. Bellis, 311 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); In Re Estate of Rutherford, 304 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); In Re Estate of Tomlinson, 186 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). See In Re Estate of Ulm, 345 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). See also Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(b); McWhorter v. McWhorter, 122 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960). . See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(b). . F.R.P. & G.P. 5.040(a)(2); see also Kiaer v…
  • In re Est. of Mary H. Beakes, 291 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
    …ill was not cognizant that the instrument he witnessed] was a Will.” Upon these facts, the trial judge found that the execution was not sufficient. He relied largely upon the opinion reported in the case of In re Estate of Tomlinson, Fla.App. 1966, 186 So. 2d 89. The trial judge recognized that the Tomlinson opinion was not exactly on point; nevertheless, he stated that it contained language indicating a holding that it was necessary for attesting witnesses to know that the instrument they were witnessing w…
  • In re Est. of Mary H. Beakes v. Taylor, 306 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1974)
    …DEKLE, Justice. Certiorari was granted in this cause to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, at Fla.App., 291 So. 2d 29 (1974), on the basis of direct conflict with In re Estate of Tomlinson, 186 So. 2d 89 (Fla.App. 1st 1966). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. Petitioner, decedent’s grandson, sought revocation of probate, alleging undue influence, lack of testamentary capacity and failure to comply with statutory requirem…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw