FLORES ET AL.

v.

PRANN ET AL

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Moises Garcia-Mir v. Smith, 766 F.2d 1478 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …re has been an exercise of administrative discretion and whether the matter of exercise has been arbitrary or capricious.” Jarecha v. INS, 417 F. 2d 220, 224 (5th Cir.1969) (quoting Kam Ng v. Pilliod, 279 F. 2d 207, 210 (7th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 860, 81 S.Ct. 828, 5 L.Ed.2d 823 (1961)).16 Because the district court’s decision was predicated solely on its review of administrative records, we review the district court’s actions de novo. Louisiana Environmental Society, Inc. v. Dole, 707 F. 2d 116…
• Paul v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 521 F.2d 194 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …rcise of administrative discretion and, if so, whether or not the manner of exercise has been arbitrary or capricious.” Jarecha v. INS, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F. 2d 220, 224, quoting Kam Ng v. Pilliod, 7 Cir. 1960, 279 F. 2d 207, 210, cert. denied, 1961, 365 U.S. 860, 81 S.Ct. 828, 5 L.Ed.2d 823. On the basis of proofs presented, we agree that petitioners failed to make their case. The denial of discretionary relief was not arbitrary or capricious.5 Petitioners, however, request a second hearing on other ground…
• Navinchandra Mafatlal Jarecha v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 417 F.2d 220 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …Talavera v. Pederson, 6 Cir., 1964, 334 F. 2d 52, 58. The extent of judicial review of a denial of discretionary relief incident to a deportation proceeding is limited. As was said in Kam Ng v. Pilliod, 7 Cir., 1960, 279 F. 2d 207, 210, cert. den. 365 U.S. 860, 81 S.Ct. 828, 5 L.Ed.2d 823 (1961): Judicial review of discretionary administrative action is limited to the questions of whether the applicant has been accorded procedural due process and whether the decision has been reached in accordance with t…