CITY OF HOLLYWOOD AND JOHN BLACK, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, APPELLANTS,

v.

GEORGE W. FRANZINI ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• O'Neal Henry Pearson v. State, 221 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
  …e 3rd District Court, in Pearson v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 425, said: “In the circumstances presented, the trial court properly refused the motion to have the identity of the confidential informer revealed.” Decca v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 186 So. 2d 92, was a case strangely parallel to the case here both in point of fact and in the contentions of the respective appellants. The charge there was sale of marijuana. The State relied upon one witness. The defendant denied the charge and offered an alib…
• Drayton v. State, 372 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …es were only peripheral and, because of their nature, could not have affected the jury’s decision. Fourth, even though the defense was an alibi and the informant could support or destroy it, this fact does not require disclosure. See Decca v. State, 186 So. 2d 92 (Fla.3d DCA 1966). Fifth, the evidence which convicted appellant was independent of any evidence relating to the informant and was corroborated by the physical evidence and the testimony of the surveillance police officers. Sixth, on the date of bot…
• Laughlin v. State, 323 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
  …guilty by a jury of possession of more than 5 grams of marijuana. The appellants urge error, going to the sufficiency of the evidence, which we find not to be well taken. State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So. 2d 893; Decca v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So. 2d 92; Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So. 2d 155; Zicca v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So. 2d 414. The appellants also urge error in a [*692] posttrial order refusing to require a newspaper reporter to reveal the source of an alleged rumor. Initially, w…

Authorities Cited

• The City OF Hollywood v. Birger A. Pettersen, 178 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)