WHITE

v.

SACKS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Hattie Mae Ricks v. Dist. OF Columbia, 414 F.2d 1097 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …* You have got to have some acts on his part to indicate that he has an ulterior motive.” . 4 N.Y.2d 469, 176 N.Y.S.2d 313, 151 N.E. 2d 871 (1958). Appellees point to People v. Merolla, 9 N.Y.2d 62, 211 N.Y.S.2d 155, 172 N.E. 2d 541, cert. denied 365 U.S. 872, 81 S.Ct. 906, 5 L.Ed.2d 861 (1961), which sustained a statute prohibiting loitering about waterfront facilities. There the court found that the term, used in this context, possessed sufficient clarity because of the statute’s “specification of faci…
• Mosley v. CIA. MAR. Adra S.A., 362 F.2d 118 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …nt unused.” Skibinski v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 360 F. 2d 539 (2d Cir. 1966). “[T]he owner warrants to longshoremen * * * a safe place in which to handle cargo.” Carabellese v. Naviera Aznar, S.A., 285 F. 2d 355, 359-360 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 872, 81 S.Ct. 907, 5 L.Ed.2d 862 (1951). There was ample evidence to support the jury’s finding that the place where Mosley was assigned to work was unsafe. Defendant also argues that the district court “submitted the case to the jury on issues other t…
• Cateno Turchio v. D/S A/S DEN Norske Africa, 509 F.2d 101 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …itten finding upon each issue of fact,” a party may waive jury determination of certain issues by failing to object to the court’s interrogatories before the jury retires. Ribeiro v. United Fruit Co., 284 F. 2d 317, 319 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 872, 81 S.ct. 905, 5 L.Ed.2d 861 (1961). See also Martin v. United Fruit Co., 272 F. 2d 347, 348 (2d Cir. 1959); United States v. H. M. Branson Distrib. Co., 398 F. 2d 929, 937 (6th Cir. 1968). . The court charged the jury: “When you retire to the jur…