ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL.

v.

REDDISH ET AL.; INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION V. REDDISH ET AL.; AND ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. V. REDDISH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Texaco, Inc, 555 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …U.S. 915, 94 S.Ct. 1410, 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974); Adams v. FTC, 296 F. 2d 861, 866-67 (8th Cir. 1961), cert, denied, 369 U.S. 864, 82 S.Ct. 1029, 8 L.Ed.2d 83 (1962); Hunt Foods & Indus., Inc. v. FTC, 286 F. 2d 803, 811 (9th Cir. 1960), cert, denied, 365 U.S. 877, 81 S.Ct. 1027, 6 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961); Chapman v. Maren Elwood College, 225 F. 2d 230 (9th Cir. 1955); Comet Electronics, Inc. v. United States, 381 F.Supp, 1233, 1242 (W.D.Mo.1974), aff’d, 420 U.S. 999, 95 S.Ct. 1439, 43 L.Ed.2d 758 (1975); Genuine…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Compagnie de Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-Mousson, 636 F.2d 1300 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …ve power— (g) From time to time to . . . make rules and regulations for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of sections 41 to 46 and 47 to 48 of this title. . In Hunt Foods & Indus., Inc. v. FTC, 286 F. 2d 803 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 877, 81 S.Ct. 1027, 6 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961), the Ninth Circuit noted: In our opinion [section 6(g)] is broad enough to authorize the [Federal Trade] Commission to provide by rule for the manner of service of process with respect to those activities and du…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Adams v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 296 F.2d 861 (8th Cir. 1961)
  …F. 2d 230; McMann v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2 Cir., 87 F. 2d 377, cert. den. McMann v. Engel, 301 U.S. 684, 57 S.Ct. 785, 81 L.Ed. 1342; Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 Cir., 286 F. 2d 803, 811, cert. den. 365 U.S. 877, 81 S.Ct. 1027, 6 L.Ed.2d 190; McGarry et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 10 Cir., 147 F. 2d 389, 392; Walling v. American Rolbal Corporation, 2 Cir., 135 F. 2d 1003, 1005; Federal Communications Commission v. Cohn, S.D.N.Y., 154 F.Supp.…