CUTLIP

v.

ADAMS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Aro Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., 377 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1964)
  …Convertible Top Replacement Co., 365 U. S. 336. We denied a petition for rehearing or alternative motion for amendment or clarification in which Convertible argued that our reversal applied only to replacements of General Motors, and not Ford, cars. 365 U. S. 890. When the District Court received the mandate of this Court, it entered judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that this Court’s decision and mandate had reversed the prior judgment in its entirety. But Convertible appealed the dismissal t…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• B. H. Bunn Co., Inc. v. AAA Replacement Parts Co., Inc., 451 F.2d 1254 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …Engineering Corp., 5 Cir. 1958, 254 F. 2d 198. If not a direct infringement, then copying a part cannot be an indirect infringement. Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 1960, 365 U.S. 336, 81 S.Ct. 599, 5 L.Ed.2d 592, reh. denied, 1960, 365 U.S. 890, 81 S.Ct. 1024, 6 L.Ed.2d 201. However, a copy may still be a “contributory” infringement of a patent if it is knowingly produced for reproduction of an infringing combination, rather than for repair of existing machines. Wilson v. Simpson, 1850, 9…
• The Maytag Co. v. The Murray Corp. OF Am., 318 F.2d 79 (6th Cir. 1963)
  …was first enacted in the 1952 patent statute. It left intact the entire body of case law on direct infringement. Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., 365 U.S. 336, 342, 81 S.Ct. 599, 5 L.Ed.2d 592, rehearing denied, 365 U.S. 890, 81 S.Ct. 1024, 6 L.Ed. 2d 201. The question of infringement is generally regarded as a question of fact. Hamilton Mfg. Corp. v. Toledo Guild Products, 210 F. 2d 237, 238, C.A.6; Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc., 122 F. 2d 796, 79…