ANDERSON
v.
ALABAMA
ANDERSON
ALABAMA
366 U.S. 208
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 6 L. Ed. 2d 233 · 81 S. Ct. 1050 · 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1234 · SCDB 1960-088
Cited by 15 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U. S. 354; Cassell v. Texas, 339 U. S. 282; Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U. S. 475.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Melvee Tucker v. State, 417 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…ion for murder in third degree cannot stand when not prosecuted within period fixed by statute). For cases in other jurisdictions see Chaifetz v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 349, 288 F. 2d 133 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 209, 81 S.Ct. 1051, 6 L.Ed.2d 233 (1961) (rule adopted as response to efforts of zealous prosecutors to avoid statute of limitations against lesser offenses); State v. Fogel, 16 Ariz.App. 246, 492 P. 2d 742 (Ariz.App.1972) (statute of limitations limits state’s power to act against…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc., 326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)…c rule, N.L.R.B. v. Mountain Pacific Chapter, 270 F. 2d 425 (9 Cir. 1959); Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. N.L.R.B., 276 F. 2d 63 (9 Cir. 1960), cert, denied, N.L.R.B. v. Hod Carriers, Bldg, and Common Laborers Union of America, 366 U.S. 910, 81 S.Ct. 1082, 6 L.Ed.2d 233 (1961); N.L.R.B. v. E. & B. Brewing Co., 276 E.2d 594 (6 Cir. 1960), cert, denied, 366 U.S. 908, 81 S.Ct. 1083, 6 L.Ed.2d 234 (1961). The First Circuit had upheld it, N.L.R.B. v. Local 176, United Brother bood of Carpenters, 276 F. 2d 583 (1960), as…
-
Waters v. United States, 328 F.2d 739 (10th Cir. 1964)…on the remedy, but a limitation upon the power of the sovereign to act against the accused. See: Benes v. United States (6 CA), 276 F. 2d 99; and Chaifetz v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 349, 288 F. 2d 133, cert. den. 366 U.S. 209, 81 S.Ct. 1051, 6 L.Ed. 2d 233, reh. den. 366 U.S. 955, 81 S.Ct. 1901, 6 L.Ed.2d 1247. We have indicated, however, following good authority, that the statute is an affirmative defense, not available in a collateral attack by habeas corpus. See: Roberts v. Hunter (10 CA), 140 F.…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (U.S. 1954)
- Cassell v. Texas, 339 U.S. 282 (U.S. 1950)
- Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1939)