BALDONADO

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Miller v. Iverne R. Carter, 434 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …uriam opinion dismissing the writs expressly adjudicated the merits. The court stated, “the totality of circumstances disclosed fails to support the substantial due process issues tendered in the petitions for certiorari * * Baldonado v. California, 366 U.S. 417, 81 S.Ct. 1355, 6 L.Ed.2d 380 (1961). Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.…
• Duncan v. Iverne E. Carter, 299 F.2d 179 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …ition was granted, limited to the two questions set out below. Baldonado v. California (Duncan v. California), 363 U.S. 840, 80 S.Ct. 1639, 4 L.Ed.2d 1735.2 On May 22, 1961, that court entered a per curiam opinion, sub nom. Baldonado v. California, 366 U.S. 417, 81 S.Ct. 1355, 6 L.Ed.2d 380, reading as follows: “After hearing oral argument and on due examination of the records, we conclude that the totality of circumstances disclosed fails to support the substantial due process issues tendered in the peti…
• United States ex rel. Stephen Radich v. The Crim. Court OF the City OF NEW York, 459 F.2d 745 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …but after oral argument on the merits, it dismissed the writ with a brief statement: “the totality of circumstances disclosed fails to support the substantial due process issues tendered in the petitions for certiorari. . ” Baldonado v. California, 366 U.S. 417, 81 S.Ct. 1355, 6 L.Ed.2d 380 (1961). The defendant then commenced a federal habeas corpus action, raising the same constitutional issues that she had placed before the Supreme Court. In affirming the district court’s refusal to grant the writ, a pa…