SIMCOX
v.
MADIGAN, WARDEN

U.S. | 1961-06-05
Nos. 699, Misc.
366 U.S. 765 Supreme Court of the United States (1961) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing as suggested by the Solicitor General. Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1962)
    …States, 361 U. S. 13; Smith v. United States, 361 U. S. 38; McAbee v. United States, 361 U. S. 537; Lurk v. United States, 366 U. S. 712. See also Page v. United States, 359 U. S. 116; Willis v. United States, 362 U. S. 216. Cf. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U. S. 765; Ragan v. Cox, 369 U. S. 437. 28 U. S. C. §§ 1291, 1294; Fed. Rules Crim. Proc. 37 (a). Cf. Carroll v. United States, 354 U. S. 394, 400-401. Fed. Rules Crim. Proc. 37 (a); United States v. Robinson, 361 U. S. 220. Fed. Rules Crim. Proc. 39 (c) (…
  • Ragan v. Cox, 369 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1962)
    …and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The order of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U. S. 765. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw