ADAMS
v.
BANMILLER, WARDEN
ADAMS
BANMILLER, WARDEN
366 U.S. 906
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LE Burkien v. Notti, 365 F.2d 143 (7th Cir. 1966)…complaint, the defendant’s statements were privileged. Barr v. Matteo, 1959, 360 U.S. 564, 79 S.Ct. 1335, 3 L.Ed.2d 1434; Howard v. Lyons, 1959, 360 U.S. 593, 79 S.Ct. 1331, 3 L.Ed.2d 1454; Sauber v. Gliedman, 7 Cir., 1960, 283 F. 2d 941, cert. den. 366 U.S. 906, 81 S.Ct. 1047, 6 L.Ed.2d 204. The proposed amendment showing the defendant’s lack of medical qualifications would not have cured the legal insufficiency of the complaint to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The order of the District…