DICKSON, WARDEN,
v.
CHAVEZ ET AL.; GASTELUM-QUINONES V. KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL

U.S. | 1961-05-08
No. 532
366 U.S. 922 Supreme Court of the United States (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Salazar v. Eads, 466 F.2d 765 (7th Cir. 1972)
    …r’s complaint is insubstantial and “obviously without merit.” Therefore, the district court’s order refusing a three-judge court was correct. Ex Parte Poresky, 290 U.S. 30, 32, 54 S.Ct. 3, 78 L.Ed. 152 (1933), motion for leave to file for reh. den., 366 U.S. 922, 81 S.Ct. 1090, 6 L.Ed.2d 245 (1961); Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103, 105, 53 S.Ct. 549, 77 L.Ed. 1062 (1933). Moreover, we concur in the district court’s conclusion that petitioner’s contention that the IUCEA is unconstitutional…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw