HIGH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Henry Broch & Co., 368 U.S. 360 (U.S. 1962)
  …owed our reversal of that Court’s earlier action setting aside the order in its entirety because Broch’s conduct was thought not to violate § 2 (c).2 Federal Trade Comm’n v. Broch & Co., 363 U. S. 166, reversing 261 F. 2d 725. We granted certiorari, 366 U. S. 923. Broch is a broker selling food products on commission for some 25 seller principals. One of his principals is [*362] Canada Foods, Ltd., a processor of apple concentrate. The Commission found that Broch, to make possible Canada Foods’ acceptance o…
• United States v. Barker, 514 F.2d 208 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …ion which Rule 32(d) erects against post-sentence withdrawal motions. The first is that post- [*220] sentence withdrawal subverts the “stability” of “final judgments.” High v. United States, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 25, 27, 288 F. 2d 427, 429, cert. denied, 366 U.S. 923, 81 S.Ct. 1350, 6 L.Ed.2d 383 (1961), and Kadwell v. United States, supra, 315 F. 2d at 670. The second reason is that the post-sentence withdrawal motion often constitutes a veiled attack on the judge’s sentencing decision; to grant such motions in…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Everett v. United States, 336 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  …well v. United States, 315 F. 2d 667, 668 n. 2, 671 (9th Cir. 1963); Briscoe v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 145, 251 F. 2d 386 (1958) (per curiam); High v. United States, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 25, 28-29, 288 F. 2d 427, 430-432 (dictum), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 923, 81 S.Ct. [*983] 1350, 6 L.Ed.2d 383 (1961) ; cf. United States v. Lias, 173 F. 2d 685, 688 (4th Cir. 1949) (alternative ground) (post-sentence permission to withdraw granted below and gov’t appeal dismissed). . Indeed the record discloses that the…