UNITED STATES

v.

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.; UNITED STATES V. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS; AND UNITED STATES V. ABSENTEE SHAWNEE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 (U.S. 1981)
  …80, n. 11 (1980) (discussing federal reservation policy). The history of the events leading up to the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 is recounted in detail in Crow Tribe of Indians v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 281, 284 F. 2d 361 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U. S. 924 (1961); Crow Nation v. United States, 81 Ct. Cl. 238 (1935); and Fort Berthold Indians v. United States, 71 Ct. Cl. 308 (1930). According to an account published in the Saint Louis Republican, Oct. 26, 1851, Treaty Commissioner Mitchell stated: “T…
• Freeman v. Charles Seligson in Bankr. of Est. of Ira Haupt & Co., 405 F.2d 1326 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …lers Ins. Co., 319 F. 2d 296 (5th Cir. 1963); 2 Collier, Bankruptcy §§ 47.04, 47.05 (14th ed. 1966). . Bankruptcy Act § 21(a), 11 U.S.C. § 44(a), quoted in part supra note 4. . Chereton v. United States, 286 F. 2d 409, 413 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 366 U.S. 924, 81 S.Ct. 1351, 6 L.Ed.2d 584 (1961). See also In re Autocue Sales & Distrib. Corp., 151 F.Supp. 798, 800 (S.D.N.Y. 1957). . Sachs v. Hadden, 173 F. 2d 929, 931 (2d Cir. 1949). . Chereton v. United States, supra note 24, 286 F. 2d at 413. . “Thes…
• The Haverhill Gazette Co. v. Union Leader Corp., 333 F.2d 798 (1st Cir. 1964)
  …ping in such separate proceedings this may cause grave difficulties. See, e. g., Gasoline Prods. Co. v. Champlin Ref. Co., 1931, 283 U.S. 494, 51 S.Ct. 513, 75 L.Ed. 1188, and United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 9 Cir., 1961, 286 F. 2d 302, cert. den. 366 U.S. 924, 81 S.Ct. 1352, 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (involving, additionally, questions of right to jury trial). Under present circumstances we adopt the rule above stated. . We do not think it necessary to distinguish to what extent the merchants may have “talked-up” t…