NAVAJO TRIBE ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Nev. Airlines, Inc. v. Langhorne M. Bond, 622 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …United States v. Vertol H21C, 545 F. 2d 648, 650-51 (9th Cir. 1976). Even assuming that our authority under § 1486(a) is limited to review of “final” agency orders, see McManus v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 286 F. 2d 414, 417 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 928, 81 S.Ct. 1649, 6 L.Ed.2d 388 (1961), the emergency determination is final in a practical sense to permit our review.5 Having determined that we have jurisdiction over the petition for review of the emergency order, it follows that our jurisdiction…
• Pinto v. States Marine Corp. OF Del., 296 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …has been held to demand with respect to locomotives and tenders, Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western R. Co., 1943, 317 U.S. 481, 487-488, 63 S.Ct. 347, 87 L.Ed. 411; Calabritto v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 2 Cir., 287 F. 2d 394, certiorari denied 1961, 366 U.S. 928, 81 S.Ct. 1649, 6 L.Ed.2d 387. The Court said, “ * * * the owner is [not] obligated to furnish an accident-free ship. The duty is absolute, but it is a duty only to furnish a vessel and appurtenances reasonably fit for their intended use,” 362 U.S.…
• Nw. Airlines, Inc. v. Goldschmidt, 645 F.2d 1309 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …CAB, 175 U.S. App.D.C. 410, 536 F. 2d 437, 439 (1976), citing Chicago & S. Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 112-13, 68 S.Ct. 431, 436-37, 92 L.Ed. 568 (1948); see also McManus v. CAB, 286 F. 2d 414, 417 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 928, 81 S.Ct. 1649, 6 L.Ed.2d 388 (1961). We think that SFAR 43, although only a temporary allocation of slots, is a final agency action. SFAR 43 denies in part the rights of several air carriers to operate at National and grants such rights to other ai…