SMART

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Henson, 443 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …egations as to (a) and (b), as alternative theories of prosecution in a single count. We find no error in that ruling. Cf United States v. Starks, 515 F. 2d 112 (3d Cir. 1975) and United States v. Goodman, 285 F. 2d 378 (5th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 930, 81 S.Ct. 1651, 6 L.Ed.2d 389 (1961). Accordingly, we deny the state’s petition for writ of certiorari. ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.…
• United States v. Starks, 515 F.2d 112 (3d Cir. 1975)
  ….Crim. No. 74—133, Order of June 4, 1972. . See, e.g., Bins v. Unitea States, 331 F. 2d 390, 393 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880, 85 S.Ct. 149, 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964); United States v. Goodman, 285 F. 2d 378, 380 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 930, 81 S.Ct. 1651, 6 L.Ed.2d 389 (1961). . In a passage as inartful as the indictment the government brief argues: “Abney further contends that, because a conspiracy to extort and an attempt to extort are separate offenses, the indictment was void fo…
• Roberts v. United States, 416 F.2d 1216 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 348 F. 2d 405, 409; Naples v. United States, 1964, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 123, 344 F. 2d 508, 513; Caster v. United States, 5 Cir. 1963, 319 F. 2d 850, 852; Smyly v. United States, 5 Cir. 1961, 287 F. 2d 760, 763, cert. denied 366 U.S. 930, 81 S.Ct. 1654, 6 L.Ed.2d 391 (1961); Belvin v. United States, 5 Cir. 1960, 273 F. 2d 583, 585; Sultan v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 249 F. 2d 385, 388; but see Chief Judge Brown’s vigorous dissent in Smyly v. United States, supra, at page 763. Si…