KOSSICK
v.
UNITED FRUIT CO.; SMITH V. BUTLER ET AL., TRUSTEES; ARMOUR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ET AL. V. C. K. WILLIAMS & CO., INC., ET AL.; GOSS V. ILLINOIS; NAVIOS CORPORATION ET AL. V. NATIONAL MARITIME UNION OF AMERICA ET AL.; KIGER V. UNITED STATES; ROMANO V. MURPHY, WARDEN
KOSSICK
UNITED FRUIT CO.; SMITH V. BUTLER ET AL., TRUSTEES; ARMOUR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ET AL. V. C. K. WILLIAMS & CO., INC., ET AL.; GOSS V. ILLINOIS; NAVIOS CORPORATION ET AL. V. NATIONAL MARITIME UNION OF AMERICA ET AL.; KIGER V. UNITED STATES; ROMANO V. MURPHY, WARDEN
366 U.S. 941
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Feguer v. United States, 302 F.2d 214 (8th Cir. 1962)…, 364 U.S. 863, 81 S.Ct. 106, 5 L.Ed. 2d 86; McNabb v. United States, 6 Cir., 1944, 142 F. 2d 904, 908-909, cert. den. 323 U.S. 771, 65 S.Ct. 114, 89 L.Ed. 616; Jackson v. United States, 1960, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 233, 285 F. 2d 675, 679-680, cert. den. 366 U.S. 941, 81 S.Ct. 1666, 6 L.Ed.2d 852; United States v. Vita, 2 Cir., 1961, 294 F. 2d 524, 531-534. Spano v. New York, 1959, 360 U.S. 315, 79 S.Ct. 1202, 3 L.Ed.2d 1265, and Powell v. Alabama, 1932, 287 U.S. 45, 53 S.Ct. 55, 77 L.Ed. 158, cited by the defe…
-
Killough v. United States, 315 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1962)…been decided fairly recently by this court. Goldsmith v. United States, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 305, 277 F. 2d 335, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 863, 81 S.Ct. 106, 5 L.Ed.2d 86; Jackson V. United States, 109 U.S. [*242] App.D.C. 233, 285 F. 2d 675, cert. denied, 366 U.S. 941, 81 S.Ct. 1666, 6 L.Ed.2d 852, with Mr. Chief Justice Warren and Mr. Justice Douglas noting that they would grant certiorari, and Naples v. United States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 281, 307 F. 2d 618. In Goldsmith and Jackson, by a divided vote, divisions of…1 / 2
-
Ricks v. United States, 334 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1964)…is to assume a fact in order to postulate a rule of law. . In prior eases the presence of counsel has not insured the silence of the accused. See, e. g., Jackson v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 233, 237, 285 F. 2d 675, 679 (1950), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 941, 81 S.Ct. 1666, 6 L.Ed.2d 852 (1961); Goldsmith v. United States, supra note 8. . Even if Ricks were considered “in the custody of the police,” that fact alone would not render his statements inadmissible. McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 346…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence