MALLINSON

v.

NASH, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …months places the prior activity at a time so remote that it destroys the probative value of the evidence to a degree that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting it. See, Medrano v. United States, 285 F. 2d 23 (9 Cir. 1960), cert. denied 366 U.S. 968, 81 S.Ct. 1931, 6 L.Ed.2d 1258. INSTRUCTION Among other things § 563.360 of Missouri Revised Statutes, 1959 V.A.M.S. provides: “* * * [A]ny person who in this state records or registers a bet or wager or sells pools upon the results of any trial o…
• United States v. Cyrus Lewis, 423 F.2d 457 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …stablish intent or motive to commit the crime charged. Robinson v. United States, 366 F. 2d 575 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009, 87 S.Ct. 717, 17 L.Ed.2d 547 (1967); Medrano v. United States, 285 F. 2d 23 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 968, 81 S.Ct. 1931, 6 L.Ed.2d 1258 (1961). In the instant case, Fitzgerald’s testimony that he had frequently purchased narcotic drugs from Lewis served to substantiate Lewis’ identification as the person making the sale specified in the indictment and…
• United States v. Phillips, 375 F.2d 75 (7th Cir. 1967)
  …4 of the majority opinion do not militate against my dissent. First of all, determination of whether the general rule or exception applies depends upon the facts in each case. In Medrano v. United States, 285 F. 2d 23 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 968, 81 S.Ct. 1931, 6 L.Ed.2d 1258 (1961), the more detailed instruction given by the court is sufficient to distinguish that case. And there was no indication by the court that the “other crime” was any different from that charged. In Bible v. United S…

  ← 1 / 2 →