DEFINO

v.

MCNAMARA, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Meehan v. Macy, 392 F.2d 822 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …at had been expunged). See Note, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 719, 722-24 (1966). And the agency is not required to consider the employee’s entire performance record in applying the standard. DeFino v. McNamara, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 300, 287 F. 2d 339, cert. denied, 366 U.S. 976, 81 S.Ct. 1947, 6 L.Ed.2d 1265 (1961). And the agency is not required to defer to the employee’s generally satisfactory performance record in applying the standard. . Reliance is misplaced on Pelicone v. Hodges, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 32, 35, 320 F. 2d 7…
• DE Fino v. Fitzpatrick, 342 F.2d 769 (1st Cir. 1965)
  …§ 863. This failed and so also did his appeal to the Commission’s Board of Appeals. His resort to the United States courts for the District of Columbia was unsuccessful. De Fino v. McNamara, 109 U.S. App.D.C. 300, 287 F. 2d 339 (1961), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 976, 81 S.Ct. 1947, 6 L.Ed.2d 1265 (1961), rehearing denied, 368 U.S. 872, 82 S.Ct. 66, 7 L.Ed.2d 74 (1961). De Fino brought suit for back pay in the Court of Claims where he again suffered dismissal on motion, and again certiorari was denied, 375 U.S.…