GENCO

v.

GENCO

Citator

Cited By

• Pre-Fab Transit Co. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 595 F.2d 384 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …commodity is the controlling consideration in determining which carriers have authority to transport aggregated commodities. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. — Investigation of Operations, 79 MCC 335, 358 (1959), aff’d 193 F.Supp. 823, (W.D.Pa.1961), and 368 U.S. 6, 82 S.Ct. 16, 7 L.Ed.2d 16 (1961). The ALJ found that the panels fit within the limited exception which allows consideration of the aggregated items as a whole when the commodities require aggregation due to their “inherent nature.” Ace Doran Haulin…
• Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. Int'l Transp., Inc., 479 F.2d 171 (8th Cir. 1973)
  …nd 750 pound bombs. In 1959 the Commission decided W. J. Dillner Transfer Co-Investigation of Operations, 79 M.C.C. 335 (1959). See also W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. I.C.C., 193 F.Supp. 823 (W.D.Penn.), aff’d Dillner Transfer Co. v. Ünited States, 368 U.S. 6, 82 S.Ct. 16, 7 L.Ed.2d 16 (1961). The Dillner decision clearly indicated that a heavy hauler could not successfully base his right to transport on the size and weight of the item palletized unless the items themselves were such that palletization w…