HAMILTON, ALIAS HAYDEN,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR MARIN COUNTY

U.S. | 1961-10-09
No. 105
368 U.S. 8 Supreme Court of the United States (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Am. Express Co. v. The United States, 472 F.2d 1050 (C.C.P.A. 1973)
    …is governed by the APA and is rule making within the meaning of that Act, citing the Third Division’s decision in Elof Hansson v. United States, 43 Cust.Ct. 627, A.R.D. 114 (1959), rev’d on other grounds, 48 CCPA 91, C. A.D. 771 (1960), cert. den., 368 U.S. 8 99, 82 S.Ct. 179, 7 L.Ed.2d 95 (1961). But whatever the status of the holdings in Hansson regarding the application of the APA to proceedings under the Anti-Dumping Act in the Customs Court,6 this court did not adopt them in reviewing that case or i…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw