CASTLE
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1961-10-16
No. 60
368 U.S. 13 Supreme Court of the United States (1961) Caution
Cited by 80 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. We are in agreement with the representations of the Solicitor General that, under the principles announced in Bell v. United States, 349 U. S. 81, the petitioner was guilty of but a single offense under 18 U. S. C. § 2314. In light of such representations and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to remit to the District Court for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

  • United States v. Cowden, 545 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1976)
    …for each check, were multiplicitous, and to have later refused his requested jury instruction that the jury could convict him of only one of those two counts if it found the checks were transported interstate simultaneously. Castle v. United States, 368 U.S. 13, 82 S.Ct. 123, 7 L.Ed.2d 75, vacating and remanding for resentencing, 287 F. 2d 657 (5th Cir. 1961) holds the simultaneous transportation of multiple forged securities to be but one offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Here, after the jury found Cowden g…
  • Cooks v. United States, 461 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1972)
    …as fatally infirm. A single trip across state lines can result in only one criminal charge of transporting forged securities in interstate commerce. Bell v. United States, 1955, 349 U.S. 81, 75 S.Ct. 620, 99 L.Ed. 905; Castle v. United States, 1961, 368 U.S. 13, 82 S.Ct. 123, 7 L.Ed.2d 75, rev’g. Castle v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 287 F. 2d 657. Notwithstanding the obvious inefficacy of the indictment,1 Defendant was ad [*532] vised by court-appointed counsel that should he go to trial on the indictme…
  • Bastida v. Henderson, 487 F.2d 860 (5th Cir. 1973)
    …rt, denied 390 U.S. 1005, 88 S.Ct. 1248, 20 L.Ed.2d 105; United States v. Serao, 2 Cir., 1966, 367 F. 2d 347; United States v. Haskins, 6 Cir., 1965,. 345 F. 2d 111. In Castle v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 287 F. 2d 657, vacated for resent-encing, 368 U.S. 13, 82 S.Ct. 123, 7 L. Ed.2d 75, the Fifth Circuit specifically adhered to the conclusiveness rule in the absence of arbitrariness. In this case, the reliable informant stated that on the day after the robbery Bastida and Morgan were still armed with…

Previewing 3 of 40 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw