DEGREGORY
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
DEGREGORY
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
368 U.S. 19
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Brennan dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DeGREGORY v. Attorney General of New Hampshire, 383 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1966)…his record is too remote and conjectural to override the guarantee of the First Amendment that a person can speak or not, as he chooses, free of all governmental compulsion. Reversed DeGregory v. Wyman, 360 U. S. 717; DeGregory v. Attorney General, 368 U. S. 19. After remand of the latter case appellant purged himself of contempt by answering in the negative the question “Are you presently a member of the Communist Party?” Subsequently, new hearings were held and it is out of them that the present case ari…