MURPHY ET AL.
v.
WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR
MURPHY ET AL.
WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR
368 U.S. 32
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murphy v. Waterfront Comm'n of N.Y. Harbor, 378 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1964)…the work stoppage because it involved a labor dispute over which the National Labor Relations Board had exclusive jurisdiction. This claim was litigated through the state courts and rejected, 35 N. J. 62, 171 A. 2d 295, and this Court denied review, 368 U. S. 32. Petitioners thereupon purged themselves of contempt but again refused to answer the questions, this time on the ground of self-incrimination. In reviewing the contempt judgments which form the bases of this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court correc…
-
Schroeder v. 171.74 Acres OF Land, 318 F.2d 311 (8th Cir. 1963)…f res judicata, the United States District Court followed the judgment of the District Court of Washington County, Nebraska, affirmed on appeal, Schroeder v. Homestead Corp., 171 Neb. 792, 107 N.W. 2d 750 (1961), cert. denied, Schroeder v. Williams, 368 U.S. 32, 82 S.Ct. 146, 7 L. Ed.2d 90 (1961) — a judgment that held that the Tysons were the owners in fee simple of the tract of land involved herein and that appellants had no right, title or interest therein. A brief resume of the pertinent facts will ai…