KAVANAGH
v.
STENHOUSE

U.S. | 1962-02-19
No. 615
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.
368 U.S. 516 Supreme Court of the United States (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rainsberger v. Fogliani, 380 F.2d 783 (9th Cir. 1967)
    …of it was made at that hearing, making it difficult to understand how counsel might have been crucial. See Wilson v. Harris, 351 F. 2d 840 (9th Cir. 1965). Judgment affirmed. . Rainsberger v. Leypoldt, 77 Nev. 399, 365 P. 2d 489, appeal dismissed, 368 U.S. 516, 82 S.Ct. 530, 7 L.Ed.2d 522 (1962), rehearing denied, 369 U.S. 832, 82 S.Ct. 849, 7 L.Ed.2d 797 (1962). . Rainsberger v. Lamb, 313 F. 2d 195 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 847, 83 S.Ct. 1907, 10 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1963). . Ward v. State of Ca…
  • Rainsberger v. Lamb, 313 F.2d 195 (9th Cir. 1963)
    …ng the accused. See Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus Cases, 35 Nev. 80, 126 P. 655 (1912). Appellant thereafter applied to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was denied without opinion. Rainsberger v. Leypoldt, Sheriff, 368 U.S. 516, 82 S.Ct. 530, 7 L.Ed.2d 522 (1962), rehearing denied 369 U.S. 832, 82 S.Ct. 849, 7 L.Ed.2d 797 (1962). Appellant then filed in the federal district court below the present writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he had exhausted his state remedies. W…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw