UNITED STATES

v.

NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Nat'l Dairy Prods. Corp., 372 U.S. 29 (U.S. 1963)
  …e indictment on the ground that the statute is unconstitutionally vague and indefinite. The District Court granted the motion and ordered dismissal. On direct appeal under the Criminal Appeals Act, 18 U. S. C. § 3731, we noted probable jurisdiction, 368 U. S. 808, because of the importance of the issue in the administration of the Robinson-Patman Act. We have concluded that the order of dismissal was error and therefore remand the case for trial. I. National Dairy is engaged in the business of purchasing,…
• Turner v. City OF Memphis, 369 U.S. 350 (U.S. 1962)
  …n order directly to this Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, also perfected a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. We postponed consideration of the question of our jurisdiction of the direct appeal to the hearing on the merits. 368 U. S. 808. [*353] Whether or not it may be said that appellant’s complaint is to be read as seeking, under 28 U. S. C. § 2281, an “injunction restraining the enforcement, operation or execution of [a] ... State statute by restraining the action of any office…