MERCANTILE NATIONAL BANK AT DALLAS
v.
LANGDEAU, RECEIVER; AND REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF DALLAS V. LANGDEAU, RECEIVER
MERCANTILE NATIONAL BANK AT DALLAS
LANGDEAU, RECEIVER; AND REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF DALLAS V. LANGDEAU, RECEIVER
368 U.S. 809
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mercantile Nat'l Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau, 371 U.S. 555 (U.S. 1963)…se in an 1882 statute 2 subsequently absorbed into 28 U. S. C. § 1348.3 Appellants brought the cases here under 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2) and, because of the finality question, we postponed ruling upon our jurisdiction until the merits were considered. 368 U. S. 809. I. The question of our appellate jurisdiction is quite similar to the one considered in Construction Laborers v. Curry, ante, p. 542, although there the jurisdiction of [*558] any and all state courts was at issue and here the inquiry is only as…
-
Manual Enters., Inc. v. Day, 370 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1962)
-
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, 373 U.S. 64 (U.S. 1963)…had been drawn in the Louisiana sales and use tax statute, the incidental discrepancy in tax burden did not amount to a discrimination against interstate commerce. 241 La. 67, 127 So. 2d 502. On appeal to this Court, we noted probable jurisdiction. 368 U. S. 809. The case was first argued during the October Term 1961. We subsequently ordered it reargued. 369 U. S. 835. [*69] I. This is another in a long line of cases attacking state taxation as-unduly burdening interstate commerce. As this Court stated in…