UNITED STATES

v.

KOENIG

Citator

Cited By

• DiBELLA v. United States, 369 U.S. 121 (U.S. 1962)
  …peals for the Fifth Circuit was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that, following recent decisions of that court, the order was interlocutory in a criminal case. 290 F. 2d 166. We granted certiorari in the two cases, 365 U. S. 809 and 368 U. S. 812, respectively, to resolve a conflict among the circuits. The settled view of the Second Circuit, that a ruling on a pre-indictment motion invariably lays the basis for immediate appellate review, in that it constitutes a “final decision” under 28 U…
• Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713 (U.S. 1962)
  …d established “the law of this case,” and that the Court of Appeals’ opinion that a three-judge court should be appointed was merely a “dictum.” 194 F. Supp. 3. We granted certiorari and a motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus.- 368 U. S. 812. We agree with the Court of Appeals that a three-judge court should have been convened in this case. When an application for a statutory three-judge court is addressed to a district court, the court’s inquiry is appropriately limited to determining…
• Hanover Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 369 U.S. 672 (U.S. 1962)
  …d (Evans v. Dudley, 295 F. 2d 713) and Sixth (United States v. Parnell, 272 F. 2d 943, affirming 187 F. Supp. 576) Circuits allowed amortization taken with reference to the special redemption prices.7 To resolve this conflict, we granted certiorari. 368 U. S. 812. [*677] Bond premium is the amount a purchaser pays in buying a bond that exceeds the face or call value of the bond.8 When a bond sells at a premium, it is generally because the interest it bears exceeds the rate of return on similar securities in…