YELLIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gilmore et ux., 372 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1963)
  …e Courts of Appeals, and the Tax Court regarding the [*41] proper application of this provision,4 and the continuing importance of the question in the administration of the federal income tax laws, we granted certiorari on the Government’s petition. 368 U. S. 816. The case was first argued at the last Term and set for reargument at this one. 369 U. S. 835. At the time of the divorce proceedings, instituted by the wife but in which the husband also cross-claimed for divorce, respondent’s property consisted p…
• Gilbert v. United States, 370 U.S. 650 (U.S. 1962)
  …one who endorses a government check by signing the name of the payee and then his own, as agent, when in fact he has no such authority, is guilty of forgery under § 495. We granted certiorari to consider the correctness of that view of the statute. 368 U. S. 816. While not mentioned in the petition for certiorari, though discussed in the briefs on the merits, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, after the Court of Appeals’ decision in the present case, held that “forgery” under § 495 does not embrace…
• Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1963)
  …ced to four concurrent terms of imprisonment, each for one year, and fined $250. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed. 287 F. 2d 292. Since the case presented constitutional questions of continúing importance, we granted certiorari. 368 U. S. 816. However, because of the view we take of the Committee’s action, which was at variance with its rules, we do not reach the constitutional questions raised.1 The factual setting is for the most part not in dispute. The Committee was engaged, in 1958…