WEED ET AL.

v.

EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …y over-complication of other facts. The question whether to summarize the evidence is one within the trial court’s discretion. See United States v. Gillilan, 2 Cir. 1961, 288 F. 2d 796 (L. Hand), cert. denied, Apex Distributing Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 821, 82 S.Ct. 38, 7 L.Ed.2d 26; Orfield, Criminal Procedure under the Federal Rules § 30.13 at pp. 42-43 (1967). In the context of this case we think that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to enumerate the interstate commerce fact…
• United States v. Gordon, 844 F.2d 1397 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …130 (1st Cir.1976); United States v. Untiedt, 493 F. 2d 1056, 1059 n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 862, 95 S.Ct. 115, 42 L.Ed.2d 98 (1974); United States v. Frank, 290 F. 2d 195, 196 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Toomer v. United States, 368 U.S. 821, 82 S.Ct. 38, 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961); but see United States v. Costner, 359 F. 2d 969, 974 (6th Cir.1966); Franklin v. United States, 330 F. 2d 205, 207 (D.C.Cir.1963). In this case Gordon first raised the duplicity issue in his Rule 29 motion at the…
• Malley-Duff & Assocs., Inc. v. Crown Life Ins. Co., 792 F.2d 341 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …force to RICO as to other federal causes, such as § 1983, § 301 of the Labor Management Reporting Act, see Auto Workers, supra, or the federal antitrust laws, see Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Co., 288 F. 2d 80, 83-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 821, 82 S.Ct. 39, 7 L.Ed.2d 26 (1961), Wilson v. Garcia, 105 S.Ct. at 1944 n. 19. We conclude that federal law controls characterization of RICO claims for limitations purposes. B. Uniform or Particularized Characterization? In characterizing Malley-D…

  ← 1 / 2 →