CENTRAL ICE CREAM CO.

v.

GOLDENROD ICE CREAM CO.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Ogden v. United States, 303 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …61). . Killian v. United States, 368 U.S. 231, 239, 82 S.Ct. 302, 7 L.Ed.2d 256 (1961). . Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 92-93, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428 (1961); United States v. Chrisos, 291 F. 2d 535, 538 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied 368 U.S. 829, 82 S.Ct. 50, 7 L.Ed.2d 32. A hearing to receive extrinsic evidence may be required to determine: Whether a particular paper is a “statement” (Campbell v. United States, supra; Palermo v. United States, 360 U.S. 343, 354-355, 79 S.Ct. 1217, 3 L.Ed.2…
• In re Carter, 618 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …o include “any person who has fulfilled the requirements for membership in such organization.” 29 U.S.C. § 402(o) (1976). In Hughes v. Local 11 of Int’l Ass’n of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, 287 F. 2d 810 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 829, 82 S.Ct. 51, 7 L.Ed.2d 32, the Third Circuit held that a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was improper once the plaintiff had alleged a substantial claim under the LMRDA. Whether the plaintiff actually was a “member” was a question…
• Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 348 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …ture of a product had moved across state lines although all the sales in question were made in the same state in which the ultimate product was manufactured. See Central Ice Cream Co. v. Golden Rod Ice Cream Co. (7 Cir.) 287 F. 2d 265, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 829, 82 S.Ct. 50, 7 L.Ed.2d 32 (1961); Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co. (3 Cir. 1946) 155 F. 2d 99; Ewing-Von Allmen Dairy Co. v. C & C Ice Cream Co. (6 Cir. 1940) 109 F. 2d 898. In contradistinction to these cases, the raw milk which arrived each day from ou…