COCHRAN

v.

HENDRICK, PRISONS SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• The Wash. Post Co. v. Keogh, 365 F.2d 965 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …personal knowledge, but asserts and relies on the truth of charges about which plaintiff does not claim to know anything. See Lark v. West, D.D.C., 182 F.Supp. 794, 798 (1960), affirmed per curiam, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 157, 289 F. 2d 898, cert, denied, 368 U.S. 865, 82 S.Ct. 114, 7 L.Ed.2d 63 (1961). Second, the affidavit does not set forth facts admissible in evidence, see Rule 43 (a), Fed.R.Civ.P., as the allegations are almost all hearsay. Jameson v. Jameson, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 176, 178, 176 F. 2d 58, 60 (1949…
• Reeves v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 346 F.2d 915 (4th Cir. 1965)
  …tate and admitted without objection, Judge Byrnes did not mention the yellow note. A motion by Reeves for a new trial was denied on April 2, 1960, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal. Reeves v. State, 224 Md. 436, 168 A. 2d 353, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 865, 82 S.Ct. 113, 7 L.Ed.2d 62 (1961). An appropriate petition for relief under the Maryland Post Conviction Procedure Act was filed on December 6, 1961, and denied on November 5, 1962. Leave to appeal from this decision was denied by the Maryland Cour…
• Royal Indem. Co. v. The United States & Jersey State Bank, 371 F.2d 462 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …ment must be such as would be admissible in evidence should they be given from the witness stand during the trial of a case.” Lark v. West, 182 F.Supp. 794, 798 (D.D.C.1960), aff’d, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 157, 289 F. 2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 865, 82 S.Ct. 114, 7 L.Ed.2d 63. Bank has made no effort to refute the unqualified affidavit of Surety or to contest the documents supporting the affidavit. Thus, no genuine issue of fact remains for disposition. Therefore, we hold as follows: (1) Def…