MCGINTY
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1961-10-09
No. 377
368 U.S. 867 Supreme Court of the United States (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hall v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 313 F.2d 483 (4th Cir. 1963)
    …views herein expressed. Reversed and remanded. . Hall v. State, 223 Md. 158, 162 A. 2d 751 (July 8, 1960). . Anno.Code of Md., 1957 Ed., Art. 27, seos. 645A-645J. . Hall v. Warden, 224 Md. 662, 168 A. 2d 373 (March 10, 1961). . Hall v. Warden, 368 U.S. 867, 82 S.Ct. 78, 7 L.Ed.2d 65 (October 9, 1961). . Stenographic transcripts of these proceedings were made part of the record in support of the petition. . Hall v. Warden, 201 F.Supp. 639 (January 23, 1962). . 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d…
  • Dixon v. State, 388 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1968)
    …ainwright, C.A. 5, 1965, 345 F. 2d 641; Wagenknecht v. Crouse, C.A. 10, 1965, 344 F. 2d 920; Von Eiselein v. Taylor, C.A. 10, 1965, 344 F. 2d 919; Pate v. Holman, C.A. 5, 1965, 343 F. 2d 546; French v. Downie, C.A. 5, 1960, 283 F. 2d 303, cert. den. 368 U.S. 867, 82 S.Ct. 68, 7 L.Ed.2d 64, rehearing den. 368 U.S. 923, 82 S.Ct. 243, 7 L.Ed.2d 138; Rupp v. Teets, C.A. 9, 1954, 214 F. 2d 312, cert. den. 348 U.S. 865, 75 S.Ct. 91, 99 L.Ed. 682; and Stonebreaker v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 163 F. 2d 498. However, none of…
  • Cunningham v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 82 (5th Cir. 1976)
    …etit jury array selection claim, which waives that objection under Texas decisional law, see, e. g., Lopez v. State, 437 S.W. 2d 268, 269 (Tex.Crim.App.1968); Singleton v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. 196, 346 S.W. 2d 328, 330 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 867, 82 S.Ct. 118, 7 L.Ed.2d 64 (1961);2 cf. Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. arts. 35.06, 35.07 [*84] (1966), under the reasoning of Francis3 and under the settled law of this circuit, see, e. g., Morris v. Sullivan, 497 F. 2d 544 (5th Cir. 1974) (per curiam), bar…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw