INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

v.

CENTRAL VERMONT RAILWAY, INC., ET AL.; UNITED STATES V. CENTRAL VERMONT RAILWAY, INC., ET AL.; AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION V. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES, TRUSTEE, V. OREGON; HORTON V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.; GORI V. UNITED STATES; ESTATE OF CUNHA V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; HAZELTON, ADMINISTRATOR, V. CITY OF SAN DIEGO ET AL.; DENNY ET AL. V. BUSH ET AL.; HOLEKAMP ET AL. V. HOLEKAMP LUMBER CO. ET AL.; LICAVOLI V. UNITED STATES; MILLET ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; ROGERS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORP. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; CLIETT V. HAMMONDS ET AL.; AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. V. QUESADA, ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY

Citator

Cited By

• Thomason v. State, 594 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …record. In sum, the record supports a trial court decision that it had sufficient reason to conclude that justice could not be served without ordering a mistrial. Cf Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364, 81 S.Ct. 1523, 6 L.Ed.2d 901, reh’g. denied, 368 U.S. 870, 82 S.Ct. 25, 7 L.Ed.2d 70 (1961); United States v. Perez, 9 Wheat 579, 22 U.S. 579, 6 L.Ed. 165 (1824); Goodman v. State ex rel. Furlong, 247 So. 2d 47 (1971). . Record page references are omitted.…
• Essex Cnty. & Vicinity Dist. Council of Carpenters & Millwrights, United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 332 F.2d 636 (3d Cir. 1964)
  …, since the language of the provisions is clear and unequivocal on its face, there is no reason to resort to the legislative history as an aid to construction. United States v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 643-648, 81 S.Ct. 1278, 6 L.Ed.2d 575 (1961), reh. den. 368 U.S. 870, 82 S.Ct. 24, 7 L.Ed.2d 70; National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers etc., v. Wood, 299 U.S. 211, 216, 57 S.Ct. 137, 81 L.Ed. 130 (1936); St. Mary’s Sewer P. Co. v. Director of U. S. Bureau of Mines, 262 F. 2d 378, 382 (3rd Cir. 1959). Sectio…
• Universal City Studios v. Sony Corp. OF Am., 659 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …son, 591 F. 2d 546 (C.A.9 1979). Resort to the legislative history of an Act is entirely unnecessary when the statute is clear and unequivocal on its face. United States v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1278, 6 L.Ed.2d 575 (1961), rehearing denied 368 U.S. 870, 82 S.Ct. 24, 7 L.Ed.2d 70. The legislative history of a statute is not relevant when the terms of the statute are clear and unambiguous. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 507 F. 2d 905 (C.A.9 1974).…