ZIEMER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (121 total)

• Vagner v. Louie L. Wainwright, 398 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1981)
  …sion of the standard has long been utilized by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. E. g., Herring v. Estelle, 491 F. 2d 125 (5th Cir. 1974); Brown v. Beto, 377 F. 2d 950 (5th Cir. 1967); McKenna v. Ellis, 280 F. 2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 877, 82 S.Ct. 121, 7 L.Ed.2d 78 (1961). In Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1981), we set forth the four basic principles or standards which are to be used to determine whether a government-appointed attorney has provided reasonably effective assi…
• Collins v. State, 382 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …pret the right to counsel to mean not errorless counsel, and counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, but counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance. McKen-na v. Ellis, 280 F. 2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. den. 368 U.S. 877, 82 S.Ct. 121, 7 L.Ed.2d 78; United States v. Fessel, 531 F. 2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1976). See also Douglas Ray Meeks v. State of Florida, 382 So. 2d 673, 1980, Florida Supreme Court. As was said in Foxworth v. Wainwright, 319 F.Supp. 593 (N.D.Fla.1970…
• Washington v. Watkins, 655 F.2d 1346 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …ering reasonably effective assistance.” Herring v. Estelle, 491 F. 2d 125, 127 (5th Cir. 1974) (quoting MacKenna v. Ellis, 280 F. 2d 592, 599 (5th Cir. 1960), adhered to in pertinent part on rehearing en banc, 289 F. 2d 928 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 877, 82 S.Ct. 121, 7 L.Ed.2d 78 (1961) (emphasis by MacKenna panel)).11 “[T]he methodology for applying this standard involves an inquiry into the actual performance of counsel conducting the defense and a determination of whether reasonably effective a…