BENZ

v.

NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY

Citator

Cited By

• Cont'l ORE Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 370 U.S. 690 (U.S. 1962)
  …ting to Continental’s alleged exclusion from the Canadian market. Certiorari was granted, limited to issues which required examination in the light of previous decisions of this Court and which presented important questions under the antitrust laws. 368 U. S. 886. We have concluded, for the reasons discussed hereafter, that the Court of Appeals’ decision must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. I. The Court of Appeals was, of course, bound to view the evidence in the light most favorable to…
• Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. & Vanadium Corp. of Am. v. Nisley, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961)
  …eral Class Actions—Jurisdiction and Effect of Judgment, 32 Ill. Law Rev. 555, 563; 3 Moore p. 3472. . For more detailed facts concerning this arrangement, see Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 9 Cir., 289 F. 2d 86, cert. granted, 368 U.S. 886, 82 S.Ct. 141, 7 L.Ed.2d 87. . Mr. Burwell, responsible USV official on the Plateau, testified as follows: “A. Well, I followed out instructions. “Q. What were the instructions with respect to this little mine, a rather valuable mine that was own…
• Metlakatla Indian Community v. Egan, 369 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1962)
  …g the fish-trap law applicable to Metlakatla and to the other appellants, and upholding its validity as so applied, - Alaska -, 362 P. 2d 901. From its judgment, the appeal is properly here under 28 U. S. C. § 1257. We noted probable jurisdiction, 368 U. S. 886. Several grounds of the decision below are now out of the case on concession of error by Alaska, but she firmly stands on the judgment in her favor. Metlakatla argues that it is immune from the fish-trap law because (1) state law cannot regulate In…